History must never repeat itself – film and talk

Holocaust Memorial day 2018 will see a film and lecture sponsored by the GCU joint unions and the Students Association. This will take place on Wednesday 31st January – in M317 at 1pm

Journey to Safety – memories of the Kindertransport is a moving  and short (26 min) film that features testimony of three individuals whose life was saved by their transport out of Nazi Germany.

Following the film, Joanna de Groot, current president of the UCU will give a short talk regarding the rise of anti-semitism, and the power of words to do this. She will also reflect on her recent visit to Bosnia with the  charity Remembering Srebrenica.

Chaired by Nick McKerrell, on behalf of the joint campus unions, and supported by the Students Association, all staff and students are welcome.

Posted in Combined Union Committee | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Deadline approaches over GCU NY licence application

Following the hearing held on May 22nd regarding the request by GCU to obtain an academic licence for its New York hub, a set of recommendations have been issued to the New York State Higher Education committee that will meet this month ‘where it will be voted on and action taken. It will then come before the full Board at its June 2017 meeting for final action’.

In the report, available here in a downloadable pdf, the department summarises the University’s case, and those of the objectors to GCU’s request.

It states that:

“GCNYC expects its year one enrolment across programs to be 40 students, split evenly between full-time and part-time students, and for enrolment to grow steadily each year. GCNYC’s expected year five enrolment is 118 full-time and 98 part-time students across all programs”.

In its academic review, the department states:

“The Department completed its initial review of GCNYC’s submitted proposals and has determined that the proposed programs meet the standards for registration (including those related to financial resources, faculty qualifications, curricula and awards) should the Board decide to grant a provisional charter”.

It summarises the objections as falling under the following general areas:

  1. GCNYC does not demonstrate actual need for a new degree-granting institution. GCNYC seeks to offer programs in a marketplace that is demonstrated to be already saturated with similar programs. (NYS institutions posit that GCU’s claims of need are not valid or remain unsubstantiated).
  2. GCNYC as an institution, and its proposed programs, are duplicative and in direct competition with several existing New York State institutions and their programs. The presence of a new institution would drain or diminish resources available for existing IHEs and negatively impact their operation.
  3. Granting a foreign institution degree-conferring authority as a NYS college which could ultimately allow it to access state and federal taxpayer monies would be precedent-setting, and could potentially open a floodgate of similar applications.

The Department then recommends that the Board of Regents approve one of the following options:

Option 1

VOTED: That the Board of Regents does not approve a Master Plan Amendment or a provisional charter for Glasgow Caledonian New York College; or

Option 2

VOTED: That the Board of Regents approve a Master Plan Amendment and grant Glasgow Caledonian New York College a five-year provisional charter, with the authority to offer programs in the discipline of Business, leading to the Master of Science (M.S.) degree.

It adds under the Timetable for implementation that:

If the Board of Regents votes to adopt Option 1, GCNYC’s applications for a provisional charter and a master plan amendment will be permanently closed.

If the Board of Regents adopts Option 2, the Department will issue it a provisional charter for five years and will register GCNYC’s programs. Pursuant to §3.22 of the Rules of the Board of Regents, during the term of a provisional charter, GCNYC would not have the authority to confer degrees and the Board of Regents would confer degrees to students who complete registered programs at GCNYC. GCNYC must apply to the Department for an absolute charter and authority to confer degrees at least 18-months prior to the expiration of the provisional period. At that point, the Board of Regents will make a determination on whether to grant GCNYC an absolute charter and authorize GCNYC to confer degrees or extend the provisional charter, or deny GCNYC any charter authority past the term of provisional authorization. If GCNYC does not apply for an absolute charter with the authority to confer degrees at least 18-months prior to the expiration of the provisional period, the provisional charter will expire at the end of its term.


GCU management has not yet given an opinion of this, but it is expected that the full Board of Regents will meet to decide the issue on June 16, and that Court, with whom responsibility ultimately lies,  will consider it the full decision at its meeting on the 22nd June.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Lack of clarity over GCU New York hearing

Several reports in the Times newspaper today and yesterday, have suggested a higher level of opposition from New York Higher Educational establishments than had been understood to be the case, over GCU’s aim of establishing a New York hub, .

Although campus unions had understood that Monday’s hearing would be live streamed, this was not the case, although it is believed that the full Board meeting which announces the result of the deliberations on June 16th may be streamed live.

The case for the opening of a hub (now to be named a College, rather than a University) had been presented to the hearing in a 20 page document, downloadable here.

Staff had been assumed, from reports at Senate,  that most of the objections to GCU’s project had been dealt with, or were minor.

However, two reports yesterday and today, in the Times, suggested a higher level of opposition on several grounds.

The meeting was described by GCU management as ‘intense and prolonged’ and it was reported that the University “presented its case strongly” with the “challenges …. no less robust with much of the objection being founded on competition”

Yesterday’s report, downloadable here suggested that the application collided with ‘the protectionist America first rhetoric of President Trump’ at the hearing suggesting that:

“Glasgow Caledonian faces fierce opposition from local private universities, who claim that there are not enough students or employers to support the arrival of a new university. The protests are being made in a political climate that has shifted dramatically since the election of Mr Trump”

One of the three person Board of Regents, representing the state education department  reportedly said:

“the prevailing attitude in this country is America first. I think everyone knows that. American employers want to support our country and want to support our students.Why hire your student, as opposed to an . . . American educated student?”

Robert Clougherty, dean of the university’s New York base, reportedly countered this with the rather surprising view that  “We are seeking to open an American college, we are not necessarily a foreign institution.”

According to the Times, Cara Smyth, representing GCU went on to argue:

“it was seeking to offer something unique, with an international perspective, and with a focus on sustainability in business that had already proven attractive to scores of companies in New York”.

She said the Scottish bid had received support from Macy’s, Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger and Eileen Fisher.

Ms Smyth added, according to the Times report, “that the campus was due to play host today to nearly 40 chief executives, from companies with a collective worth of $365 billion, as part of the outreach and convening work in the fashion industry that the college had conducted in the absence of any students”.

Support for the application came from Melanie Steiner, chief risk officer with the clothing company PVH Corp, which owns Calvin Klein, Speedo, and a host of other brands, who said her company struggles at present to find graduates with the training the new college would offer.

“I appreciate the point about America first,” she said. “But talent management has become fully global now.”

Yesterday’s Times article however ended by claiming that “Such arguments were loudly contradicted, however, by the leaders of private universities in New York city”.

The second report in today’s Times, downloadable here, focussed on the university’s plan to charge students almost $35,000 (£27,000) for a masters degree at its Manhattan base which they believed undermined claims that its expansion was aimed at helping the poor.

According to the Times, the university had said its desire to open a New York base was driven by a “defining social mission” which includes “creating a better and fairer world”.

Joseph Muriana, a vice-president at New York’s Fordham University, the oldest Catholic HE institution in the northeastern United States, and the third-oldest university in the state of New York however ‘ridiculed’ the idea that Glasgow Caledonian was seeking to cater for poorer students, pointing to the $34,650 cost of their masters degrees, which is mid-market in New York in terms of cost. The degrees would take one year to complete for a full-time student.

Mariana also warned that granting a foreign university the right to offer degrees in New York could “open the floodgates”, raising the prospect of more prestigious institutions opening offshoots on its doorstep.

Mr Muriana added: “An application from the University of Connecticut, or from Rutgers [in New Jersey] or UPenn [the University of Pennsylvania] to establish a campus in New York would be seen as absurd. The application from Glasgow Caledonian University should be seen in a similar light.”

The Times report ended by pointing out that a representative from the New York City Economic Development Corporation voiced strong support for the application and noted that it is understood that the university plans to offer scholarships in New York if its application is approved. A final ruling is expected next month on June 16th/17th.

Posted in Combined Union Committee, Court, Governance | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

GCU Staff still hoping for dialogue regarding New York hub

A week after the third all-staff meeting expressing concern about the lack of clarity and dialogue over GCU’s New York hub, press reports suggest some confusion over the amount of support for the venture from other New York educational establishments (see follow on blog post above on the Times reports)

The meeting, called by all campus unions updated staff on the successful lobby of Holyrood, where 20 MSPs were in contact, or spoke directly to our cross union delegation. Staff were also informed of our regret that Court members had not taken the time to dialogue with concerned staff at the follow up lobby of their meeting in the Britannia building.
Staff at the meeting – who represented all 5 campus unions – were surprised that a response from the university from GCU to the Presiding Officer of Holyrood following his intimation of concern about the project, stated that opposition had been expressed ‘from only two unions’, and ‘supported by one union representative in particular’, and were also surprised to find that following a  letter of concern from John Mason MSP, the head of communications at GCU had suggested that the sum total of opposition to the project might be limited to the eight or so delegated union reps who had travelled to speak to MSPs.
It is unfortunate that rather than acknowledging the issues of concern from the academic, professional service and support staff, and student community, there seems to be a preference to suggest, the concern is really not there, or somehow it’s confined to a vocal and presumably unrepresentative minority.
When according to press reports, $15m has been invested in a project at a time of austerity – with no positive results as yet, then we need a serious and respectful discussion with staff, rather than a dismissal.
We also expect Court – where the responsibility lies to ensure that university management are given adequate guidance on strategy – to at least acknowledge that staff and students may have an opinion about this.

Posted in Combined Union Committee, Court | Tagged | Leave a comment

Little willingness shown by GCU Court to discuss with staff

Despite staff concerns about the investment of up to £15million into a New York hub, which still does not have a licence, and no students, and a wages bill of over £500k, staff members attending the lobby of Court were disappointed that no Court members, apart from staff reps, took any time to discuss their concerns with them.

In a contrast with the attention given by MSPs at the previous week’s lobby of Holyrood, the Court seems to have given little thought to the increasing concern in the university community over the use of critical resources. Some Court members took the joint union leaflet requesting dialogue (found here), but others did not take the leaflet.

A short video of the event (only on twitter at the moment) can be seen here.

Last year, the normal meeting for staff to question the Chair of Court, and staff governors was cancelled, in favour of an invite to staff to attend  a lunch time buffet with some members of Court. At present there appear to be no plans to re-instate the yearly meeting – which was the only one which allowed a video link with staff in GCU London.

Likewise the Trade Unions who requested observer status pending the two places being made available for TU nominees have had their request postponed for future discussion later in the year by Court.

Neither have invites to Court representatives to observe all-staff meetings (which were expressing concern about New York) been taken up.

Minutes of Court meetings which ought to be on the university website have not been posted since March of last year.

In her response to a joint letter from the Campus unions, requesting that 5 minutes were spared to talk to staff at the lobby, the chair replied:

“Thank you for the information about CUC’s plans to lobby Court members tomorrow and the suggestion that I come to hear staff concerns about GCUNY.  I’m afraid the latter would be difficult as it is already a very full day.  This includes a Court lunch at 12.30, followed by a presentation on the Caledonian Club, and we will move immediately over to the Board Room for the Court meeting”.

She went on to assure the Trade Unions that

“GCUNY has been a prominent item on the Court’s agenda since it took the decision to establish a presence in NY and seek a licence to award degrees.  This vigilance will continue.”

Speaking to the lobby before going in to the meeting of Court, Staff representative Douglas Chalmers, assured those present that together with Davena Rankin, he would endeavour to convey the feelings of staff to Court on this and other issues.

It is understood that following the lobby, the intention of the CUC is to call a meeting of staff and ask the chair of Court to address staff concerns about this issue.

Posted in Combined Union Committee, Court, Governance | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

GCU staff and students raise concerns about New York Hub at Scottish Parliament

MSPs from Glasgow and wider afield met the delegation and shared concerns over GCU New York

GCU staff and students brought their campaign for an independent investigation of the events surrounding the university’s New York hub, to Holyrood MSPs today.

Concerned MSPs, including the presiding officer had already been in touch with members of GCU staff regarding staff concerns about the expenditure of £10 million, including salaries of £250,000 plus for one staff member and over £100,000 for another. It is believed that there are four full-time staff employed at the hub, despite the campus having no students, and the hearing for the licence application being postponed yet again to the 22nd May, with a decision ‘likely to be taken by the Board of Regents in early June’

The delegation of union representatives from all campus unions, and notably also from the Students’ Association explained their concerns to MSPs and asked for their support for an independent inquiry.

A spokeswoman for the GCU Students Association said “Our Executive committee is deeply concerned at this stage about the future to recover expenditure from the GCU New York campus and the level of expenditure so far. This is particularly hard to take given the funding cuts we face on our Glasgow campus”.

Dr Nick McKerrell, Combined Union Convenor, said:

Staff are up in arms over the whole GCU New York project. This unnecessary extravagance has taken place when staff in Glasgow face the age of austerity. It is now three years behind schedule and has cost £10 million. This is despite not one student crossing the threshold as the application for a teaching licence has not been awarded. It looks like no proper due diligence was done initially, leaving us in this untenable situation. Both staff and students are now united in their calls for an independent investigation. There are serious financial questions to be answered.”

In a message to staff yesterday, GCU Principal Professor Pamela Gillies indicated that the campus once up and running would no longer be named a University, but would rather have the name of Glasgow Caledonian New York College,  ‘in line with naming of other higher education institutions in the USA’ .  Professor Gillies stated that ‘the application process has been rigorous and we have complied thoroughly with each aspect. This has included our investment in premises designed to meet the requirements of NYSED, as part of our application’. She also stated that ‘there was no possibility of a licence without our holding suitable educational premises’, adding ‘we are now at a very advanced stage of NYSED’s application process with some encouraging signs of a good outcome, although nothing can be assumed’.

The University Court has been notably silent on the issue of GCU New York. This year the standard practice of a meeting for all staff to question the Chair, lay governors and staff governors was replaced by a chance for staff to chat over lunch with Court members. Invitations to Court representatives to attend and observe all staff meetings have not been taken up.  Staff are now hoping that the Court will talk to staff regarding their concerns about the continuing situation at our New York hub.

In 1998 a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General into events at that time in GCU referred to the need for continual critical scrutiny by Court of management actions. In the words of the report, which still merit attention.

“The Council were concerned that, where lay governors are greatly dependent on the executive for information, there is a danger of creating a culture in which the governing body place too much reliance on such information without being in a position to critically evaluate it. In such cases senior management may effectively control the form and content of how issues are presented and limit and restrict any challenge from lay governors. The Council concluded that in a number of instances at the University the Court did not receive adequate information”.

It is important that the Court makes it clear what the case is for the New York hub and how their monitoring has been carried out.


Posted in Combined Union Committee, Court, Governance, Management | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Victory for GCU Catering workers – no jobs to be lost

Campus Unions reacted positively to the news today that an apparently positive ending had been reached to the catering fiasco which had been threatening Cordia workers jobs. According to a statement from the university, reported in the Evening Times here, an agreement has been reached to transfer the catering contract to BaxterStorey with staff now being offered the opportunity to transfer to the new company under TUPE regulations.

As originally reported in Caledonianunion, https://caledonianunion.com/2016/11/04/a-dark-day-for-the-university-for-the-common-good/ the proposals first put forward seemed likely to lead to a massive loss of jobs, and such was the anger of staff and students that following a long campaign with the city unions that represented the Cordia staff, a temporary reprieve was granted (https://caledonianunion.com/2016/11/14/reprieve-for-threatened-workers-as-catering-common-sense-is-applied-at-gcu/)  After this staff at a mass meeting voted if jobs were to be lost, to boycott any new outlets, (https://caledonianunion.com/2016/11/22/gcu-staff-vote-for-boycott-if-catering-jobs-are-lost/), and concerns were raised in the Scottish Parliament about the university’s handling of the issue: (https://caledonianunion.com/2016/11/16/scottish-parliament-support-reprieve-for-gcu-catering-workers-jobs/).

Campus unions had argued that catering should be taken ‘in-house’ as is the case in many other universities, but could not sway management in favour of this.

However, our main task of safeguarding Cordia workers jobs and pensions has been successful but we will be maintaining a watching brief on how the handover progresses and how the transition is achieved. And of course our admiration goes out to the women and men in GCU catering who have served us so well over the years, and who stuck together in the long battle to eventually win victory.

Posted in Combined Union Committee, Management | Tagged , | Leave a comment